-That my mom has Mercury and Venus in her 1st house and I have Uranus and Neptune in my 1st house and Uranus is "higher octave" of Mercury & Neptune is "higher octave" of Venus??
Do you think this is weird? I mean it's like I am meant to be on a higher level than her?
O.o I am really confused what that does it means. . .? ThanksIt's not weird, as many families have similar placements in their birthcharts.
It also does not mean that you're meant to be on a higher level as her. "Higher octave" doesn't mean better or smarter or more advanced as such, it's a term that expresses how Uranus and Neptune often have wider concerns than Mercury and Venus as they are not personal planets but generational planets (they move much more slowly). In my opinion, relating these four planets to eachother is not really very helpful. They have different domains and, in the end, represent quite different things. That's just my opinion.
I will first say that your mother doesn't have Mercury in the 1st house, it is behind her Ascendant which means it is in the 12th house. Your mother will probably be very charming and personable with Venus in the first house. You may also be interesting to others, but it will be in a slightly more offbeat way. You may be very adaptable ad changeable, and people may find it hard to pin your personality down entirely. With all that Leo, I'm not really surprised that one of your first thoughts is to wonder whether you're meant to outshine the people around you. At times you will, at times you won't. In the end, you and your mother have quite different charts and one is not a higher expression of the other.Meanings nothing.
I am serious about it. It meanings nothing.
YOU BELIEVE IN THIS???
I tried an experiment a few years ago. I had this friend trying to persuade me that I should call for a reading. She gave me the phone number of her reader.
I called, but I gave completely bogus information about my birth date, etc. I recorded the result and sent it to my friend.
She waxed rhapsodic about how accurate it was, pointing out things that she thought agreed with my personality and my history.
Then, when I told her that I had given a bogus birthdate etc, she told me I wasn't playing fair.
So ... she was completely willing to accept the accuracy of a reading that was (at least theoretically) based on nothing. In truth, it was based on the person talking to me and had nothing to do with what planet was in what zodiac symbol and where the Sun was. It had far more to do with the reader's ability to read between the lines when talking to me. An intuitive reader with bogus information will presumably do better than a non intuitive reader with correct information.
What does that tell you about the information?
Of course, to do a true apples-and-apples test, I would need to be able to give the same reader incorrect data and correct data and be able to compare her results - but if she remembers me, that won't work.
I will admit, my little test wasn't particularly statistically valid (not enough samples), but there has been a ton of statistical work on this subject, and NOBODY has found any repeatable correlation between these various astronomical phenomenon and anything else. There is some correlation between when you were born in the year and your personalities having to do with how old you were when you entered the school system ... but that has NOTHING to do with where the stars were.
If you want to read your horoscope and think its fun - go for it. However, it is just as accurate as flipping lots of coins. If you learn anything about yourself, it has more to do with your ability to analyze yourself than where the planets are.
没有评论:
发表评论